Thursday, April 30, 2026

The Psychology Behind Classic TV Viewing


I was perusing YouTube recently (a more enjoyable exercise than perusing network television these days), and I came across a video with 1.6 million views called “The Psychology of People Who Rewatch the Same Shows and Movies.” It was posted by “SketchPsyche,” which purports to be a channel that provides “deep dives into the psychology behind everyday behavior.”

“We live in a world obsessed with what’s new,” the video relates. “But some people just ignore it all.” Something in our psyche pushes us to choose the vintage over the contemporary: “They know every line, ever scene, every joke and yet they press play again.”

The video, just under six minutes, offers four descriptions of people who would rather rewatch The Fugitive for the 50th time than check out The Pitt. Can you see Dr. Bob Hartley sharing these insights with his therapy group?




Type One: The Comfort Seeker
We are told that for these people life feels unpredictable because of work problems and relationship issues and a world that’s changing too quickly. They watch old shows because they are predictable – they know the crisis in that episode will be resolved and everything will be okay. The certainty of that serves the emotional safety they seek.

There’s some merit to this, though seeking comfort in the familiar is hardly new or limited to television. I’m semi-retired now, but when I was working full-time, I often took solace in activity that I knew would reduce my stress level. For some that’s listening to Brahms, for others reading the Bible, and for others an evening spent with Lucy or Jeannie or Marshal Matt Dillon.




Type Two: The Cognitive Restorer
People in this category have exceptionally stressful jobs that require a lot of thought and problem solving. As a result, their brains are not up to the challenge of grasping new shows with new characters and stories. Familiar material allows the brain to relax and experience what psychologists call cognitive load reduction.

This is so closely related to the previous category that I’m not sure it needs its own designation. Once again, the objective is to reduce real-world stress through a recreational activity that is guaranteed to not cause anxiety.




Type Three: The Nostalgic Anchor
In this group are people who rewatch shows not as much for the show itself, but for the memories they attach to it. It reminds them of a better time in their life, and friends and family members who may now be gone. They can’t bring those moments back, but they can experience once again the shows that were a part of those moments.

If I had to put myself into one of these four categories, this is the one that is most applicable. I do watch my favorite classics repeatedly because I genuinely enjoy them, but there is also within that experience a subconscious recognition of what my life was like when those shows were new, and how it is much different now. That perception has intensified in recent years from a series of major life changes, but it was there even before those events transpired.

I also think for me it’s not just an association with personal memories and relationships that is fed by classic shows – but also a chance to reconnect through these shows to an America that no longer exists. Not one free from challenges or tragedies, as there has never been such a place. But through all we endured in generations past there remained a bedrock that not only sustained but helped us get through such turbulent times. That bedrock is in jeopardy now from a systematic dismantling of western culture by enemies both foreign and domestic.

Not everyone shares that view, I know, but for those that do, we like our virtual visits to Minneapolis when Ted Baxter was delivering the news on WJM, and prefer them to what’s transpiring there now.




Type Four: The Detail Hunter
These are the people that enjoy uncovering small details and hidden layers that only can be discovered through repeat viewings. “For them,” we’re told, “a show isn’t just a story, it’s a world, and they want to see every corner of it.”

While it’s always fun to notice something in a favorite show that we had not noticed before, this one is not applicable to me. How about you?

There is one other reason I still prefer comfort TV to what’s new. I find these shows and their characters to be inspiring, and helpful in keeping me on the right path in this life. Such lessons originate from my religious faith, but it’s nice to see them validated in a more modern setting than 1st century Judea.

The good news from all this, according to SketchPsyche, is that there is nothing wrong with people who stick with the classics. “They’re not stuck in the past,” the video says. “They’re choosing what their mind needs.” And if classic TV shows really provide emotional security, reduce stress, and convey a reminder of happier times, my only question is “Why isn’t everyone doing this?”

10 comments:

  1. It's an interesting analysis, and a typically good writeup from you! What I'm more interested in, though, is the psychology of someone who, given the choice between an unseen show from the 1960s and an unseen show from today, chooses the show from the Sixties. Does that mean you have a different analysis altogether, that of a person who, making a value judgment, chooses to identify with the surety of values of the past as opposed to the distain for the values (or lack of same) of today? And if so, what does that actually mean, not just for the individual, but for the society in general?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't think younger generations are as curious now about what went before as we might have been, whether it's TV, movies or music. It's amazing how many YouTube reactor channels there are with people in their 20s who have never heard a Beatles song. I believe in the situation you describe they will almost always choose the recent unknown over the vintage one, because they view older material as less sophisticated or enlightened.

      Delete
    2. I would choose the unseen older movie. So much can be found online now, and last summer we went on a search for movies and TV shows that either were cut altogether or were shows that only had a pilot or a few episodes. It was very interesting, and we discovered many series that I had never heard of before.

      Delete
  2. Wow--interesting topic, and you covered this really well, David. And like yourself, I very much saw where I fit in here--"The Nostalgic Anchor". At the same time, I go back and watch old episodes of Mary Tyler Moore and honestly shake my head at the brilliance on my screen. Loved it as a kid, loved sitting in our old farmhouse on a Saturday night with my parents and siblings on the floor, but given all the dreck out there now I appreciate the older stuff even more, and for more than the memories they evoke. (And I did watch all of 'The Pitt', and I respect the hell out of it, but the moment I saw that image you posted of Dr. Hartley's office--I'll take that over Pitt anytime!) PS. I find those reactor videos on Youtube as annoying--"My first time hearing Karen Carpenter sing Close to You". Yes of course she's wonderful, I don't need some 20something telling me that!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I understand that response to reactor videos - but I am also reassured that some of the entertainment we enjoyed decades ago can still resonate with younger viewers and listeners. We don't need anyone telling us Karen Carpenter could sing, but how sad if we ever get to a time when no one knows her name.

      Delete
  3. I most definitely fall into the Nostalgic Anchor category. I had heard the term homesick, of course, but never experienced it, at least not for a place.

    However, as an only child and as I’ve grown older and beloved family members have passed on, I find I’m not homesick for a place so much as I am for people.

    Though I’m only in my fifties, I became the matriarch of the family eight years ago when I lost my mother. That's the same year I became a grandmother, and I can attest that joy and sorrow can coexist.

    My husband and I are both lovers of old movies. Though he’s a movie buff of all genres. I rarely watch current television shows. Which is funny because I remember as a child every week reading the TV Guide to see what would be on.

    My granddaughter has reached an age where I’m excited to introduce her to some favorites I grew up with this summer. Anne of Green Gables tops the list at the moment.

    Sorry I’m so long-winded, but I just ran across your blog this evening. I have truly enjoyed reading and will continue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for stopping by! I'm a bit older than you but we've followed similar paths in our lives. And I loved Anne of Green Gables as well. Prince Edward Island is still on my bucket list.

      Delete
  4. For old shows, I fall into the "The Comfort Seeker" category. I enjoy stepping into the world of "Leave it to Beaver" or "The Waltons". I'm also a "Cognitive Restorer", but I've found the best thing for that is watching something completely mindless and unchallenging, such as a Youtube channel of someone doing landscaping or cleaning a pool. My wife will find me on the couch doing this after a long day of work (I've worked from home since Covid). I tell her "I'm driving home" as that was the old way my brain would wind down, although traffic wasn't quite as relaxing.
    I belong to a few classic television show Facebook groups and observe a lot of "Detail Hunters" who try to put meaning into every word and set design and then get angry when a later episode contradicts that. Common responses to that are, "It's just a show." Both sides get tiresome.
    While I have some "Nostalgic Anchor" traits, it's probably the least like me. I do remember specific moments watching a particular episode, but it's not what draws me to them. As a kid, I watched TV almost exclusively alone. My Dad didn't watch TV, my mom was always doing housework or talking on the phone and my older siblings had left, so I don't feel that connection to memories of loved ones and communal viewing.

    I will always choose a classic show over a new one, in fact, I couldn't even name a current show. I have no idea what "The Pitt" is. The last new show I probably watched was "Stranger Things" because it brought it's own nostalgia with it, but even that grew tiresome.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had heard about "The Pitt" from some friends so I knew it was a current popular show - but I've never watched it either and I wouldn't even know where to find it!

      Delete
  5. I like to think of myself as a comfort seeker and I love to watch the older classics on TV and online from the 50s to the 70s, even though most of the shows that make up that era were on before I was born and I had to discover them through reruns. I'm willing to go on record and say that I would rather watch a terrible episode of "Gilligan's Island" than an outstanding one of "Seinfeld" any day, any year. My reasons are as follows:


    ---The shows existed in a simpler, less stressful, era.

    ---Families were modeled on what we wanted ours to be like, rather than what we were already like. Parents were treated with respect, even when they were wrong.

    ---Plots dealt with fantasy and escapism, rather than reality and truth.

    ---They were also creative and imaginative. Each week, the viewer felt like he was watching an exciting bedtime story, rather than a standard stand-up routine.

    ---Nobody ever died, nobody ever got hurt. Violence was strictly of the cartoon variety. The most serious problems anyone ever faced was whether they could get dates for Saturday night. Not having one constituted a major crisis.

    ---We can emphatise and feel for the characters, even the bad guys, and we can laugh with them, instead of at them.

    ---Speaking of bad guys, there was always a clear distinction between good and evil, right and wrong. Good always triumphed over evil and evil was always punished. Today, it seems like the bad guys are the heroes.

    ---Sex and other adult themes were implied rather than demonstrated, which sometimes added to the humour.

    ---In the 50s and 60s, there were NO REALITY SERIES!!!!

    ---Or maybe, the shows as a whole were simply better and funnier. To be fair, I also have many favorites from the 80s to the present, and that will never change, but for me, give me the 'oldies' any day. I will never get tired of watching them, and loving it!!

    ReplyDelete