If you visited Las Vegas
this year, you may have seen some of these shows playing at various resorts on
and off the Strip:
The Australian Bee Gees
MJ Live: Michael Jackson
Tribute Concert
Bruce in the USA: Bruce
Springsteen Tribute
Purple Reign: The Prince
Tribute Show
Abba: The Concert – a
Tribute to Abba
Wanted: A Tribute to Bon
Jovi
Jay White is America’s
Diamond: Honoring Neil Diamond
There were more, but you
get the idea.
When I moved to Las Vegas
back in 1982, the only tribute show that drew an audience featured an Elvis
impersonator. But today, it seems there is a much greater interest in
celebrating the music of previous generations.
So I can’t help but wonder:
Could the same thing happen with television shows?
Classic shows are already
revisited in myriad ways. There have been parodies, like The Rerun Show (2002) and The Real Live Brady Bunch stage show. We’ve also had a wave of (mostly
lousy) feature film adaptations, where the original series is a starting point
from which to take the concept into new territory.
Remakes? Tim Daly headlined
a new version of The Fugitive in
2000. Family Affair was revived in
2002 with Gary Cole as Bill Davis and Tim Curry as Mr. French, and Charlie’s Angels returned to television
in 2011. None of these attempts were successful. New takes on Dragnet and The Bionic Woman also flopped. The new Dallas had its moments. The new Dynasty
did not.
More recently we’ve had
something that comes closer to a true continuation of a classic series, with
the new episodes of Roseanne and Will and Grace now airing, and more Murphy Brown coming soon. Ratings have
been very impressive, suggesting audiences are glad to be reunited with TV
characters they first met decades ago.
So would audiences be
equally happy to spend more time with Ann Marie and Don Hollinger, or James
West and Artemus Gordon, or the Cartwright family?
There are obvious reasons
why these projects could not be attempted with the original stars. But if you carefully and respectfully recast the roles, reproduce every other aspect of the original show, and
resist any urge to "re-imagine," "update" or "modify," would that result in a successful revival? If the right tone was captured would there be an
audience for new episodes of Gunsmoke
or Mannix, I Dream of Jeannie or Father
Knows Best, Perry Mason or The Man From UNCLE?
I think so – if the
new episodes stayed true to what made the source material successful, with no
self-awareness, no casting or scripts based on 21st century
sensibilities, and no winking at the audience. The only goal should be not to
remake but to revive, with as much authenticity and attention to detail as
possible.
Think about The Brady Bunch Movie (yes, I know, I
always come back to The Brady Bunch).
While that project had its own satriric slant on the material, consider the
possibilities of putting a lookalike cast like that one into a new 30-minute
script with the kind of plot viewers came to expect from the series, and
without exaggerating aspects of their characters for comic effect. Would the
result be close enough to the actual show to satisfy fans?
Since the objective is to
produce new episodes that would fit comfortably into the series’ original runs,
that requires setting them in the same era; so no cell phone for Joe Mannix, no
GPS for Bo and Luke Duke, no Chip and Ernie Douglas doing homework on a
computer. And no updated wardrobe for Mike Brady.
Again, would it succeed? Could
a sincere attempt to write, produce and perform new episodes of old shows capture
enough of the flavor of the originals – or would the hurdle of accepting a new
cast in iconic roles be too great to overcome?
I think it would work. And
I think the ratings success of networks like MeTV proves there is an audience
that would embrace a continuation of shows that ended decades ago. I also
believe there is an audience eager to have more family-friendly viewing
options, and most of the series from the Comfort TV era fit into that category.
There is another option for
reviving classics, and that is through the same technology that will soon be
used to bring Marilyn Monroe back for a new movie about her life. Today’s CGI
can create digital avatars of characters as they appeared in a show from 50
years ago. Voices? Those can be recreated as well. Many films now combine
practical sets with digital effects, and most viewers can’t tell where the real
parts of a frame stop and the CGI starts.
Far too expensive to do for a TV series now, but there was a time when videocassette recorders were cutting-edge technology that cost $1,500.
I’m not saying it might
happen for classic TV shows – I’m saying it absolutely will happen. And I for
one cannot wait.
“…resist any urge to 're-imagine,' 'update' or 'modify,'…no self-awareness, no casting or scripts based on 21st century sensibilities, and no winking at the audience.” Therein lies the issue. I think we may never know if such revivals could work. Producers cannot resist the urge to “update”. That old chestnut needs to be sexier, edgier, or more “socially relevant”- a catchphrase which usually means seedier. I’ve always been a huge fan of The Rifleman, but I shudder to think of what a revival would be like. I’m sure it would be inconceivable today to feature an adult male character who didn’t regularly fool around.
ReplyDeleteI fear you may be right - creative egos will always think they can do something to make a work of art better, even if that is not the objective. But it's fun to think about.
DeleteThere WAS a Perry Mason reboot with an entirely new cast back in 1973. It only lasted half a season.
ReplyDeleteI think you're underestimating the "uncanny valley" factor of having a reboot that tries to stay close to the original, but features new actors attempting to mimic the old.
ReplyDeleteThere was a reboot of Are You Being Served? in 2016:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4qpb7t
Other than adding "diversity" to the cast, it hews pretty close visually and linguistically to what the show was, but just comes across as a gross parody if you're a fan of the original.
I always pictured a musical version based on the 70's kid's show The Electric Company.
ReplyDeleteCheck out the following URLs:
ReplyDeletehttps://youtu.be/rm3QTiUcpHY
https://youtu.be/1_jTDHlYckI
Great topic! Me, I would be opposed to any revival or reboot of classic TV shows, especially with new casts but even with the original. The MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE revival of the late-'80s was awful. The GET SMART revival with Adams and Feldon was awful. The COLUMBO, ROCKFORD FILES, and PERRY MASON TV movies were awful (from the few that I've seen). As Blakeney noted above, producers cannot resist the urge to update and change, invariably for the worst.
ReplyDeleteI'm such a fundamentalist on this I dislike even the STAR TREK movie franchise because of all the changes that made the characters strangers to me. I disliked the two WILD, WILD WEST reunion movies circa 1980 that reunited Conrad and Martin, but which nonetheless were missing something integral. You can't go home again, wrote Thomas Wolfe, and you can't go back years later and recapture the moment, the chemistry, or whatever it was that made a series great.
Taking it back to BRADY BUNCH--I love that show, too!--I hated the reunion movies filled with drama and divorce and fake Jan, BUT... I really enjoyed the BRADY BUNCH movies with Gary Cole and Shelley Long. They didn't attempt to be in the original series' continuity, and were spoofs done with admiration and respect for the source material. Compare them to most other movies based on beloved shows that, as you wrote, use it as a starting point to go in their own directions--usually vulgar and crass--e.g., DUKES OF HAZZARD, LAND OF THE LOST, and CHIPS (none of which I saw, but read about with despair).
So no, I don't want to spend time with the Bradys outside of the five-season canon. But there are newer shows that have a similar that vibe. I watched with my kids growing up DRAKE AND JOSH, iCARLY, GOOD LUCK, CHARLIE, DOG WITH A BLOG and others and thought they captured well what made those family-friendly shows of yesteryear work so well. And I'm glad they did it with original ideas and characters, not plundering pre-sold names and concepts.
Mr. Peterson, what do you have to say about the 1980 telefilm "The Return of Frank Cannon"? What do you have to say about the 1992 TV movie "Back to the Streets of San Francisco," which had Karl Malden but neither Michael Douglas (in new footage, anyway) nor Richard Hatch?
DeleteChristopher, I haven't seen either film, though the RETURN OF FRANK CANNON is included with my DVD set and so I'll watch it and get my money's worth. No interest in tracking down the STREETS film (can't call it a reunion without Douglas or Hatch). It wasn't included with the SoSF set.
DeleteJudging from this blog commentary of yours, Mr. Hofstede, I have a feeling that you don't care that much for the "Hawaii Five-O" reboot known as "Hawaii Five-0." Is that right? How about the 2009-2010 "Melrose Place" revival? At least Heather Locklear participated in the latter.
ReplyDeleteActually, the "Dynasty" reboot HAS been renewed. However...
Mr. Hofstede, you might want to check out the following URL:
Deletehttps://youtu.be/3aSIX8SZo-I
*sigh*
ReplyDeletehttp://variety.com/2018/tv/news/roseanne-canceled-abc-1202824211/
http://variety.com/2018/tv/news/roseanne-abc-cancellation-tv-advertising-upfront-1202824266/